[PATCH v2 04/16] Use msgsnd syscall for Linux implementation

[Yury Norov]

Hi Adhemerval,

On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 05:26:41PM -0200, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> Changes from previous version:
> 
>   - Use __ASSUME_SYSVIPC_SYSCALL instead of __NR_syscall to issue the
>     wired syscall or the ipc one.
> 
> --
> 
> This patch add a direct call to msgsnd syscall if it is supported by
> kernel features.
> 
> hecked on x86_64, i686, powerpc64le, aarch64, and armhf.

Typo?

> 
> 	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/msgsnd.c (__libc_msgsnd): Use msgsnd syscall
> 	if defined.
> ---
>  ChangeLog                        | 3 +++
>  sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/msgsnd.c | 7 ++++---
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/msgsnd.c b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/msgsnd.c
> index 1457e43..4ed3a64 100644
> --- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/msgsnd.c
> +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/msgsnd.c
> @@ -16,17 +16,18 @@
>     License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see
>     <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.  */
>  
> -#include <errno.h>
>  #include <sys/msg.h>
>  #include <ipc_priv.h>
> -
>  #include <sysdep-cancel.h>
> -#include <sys/syscall.h>

IIUC, ipc_priv.h is only needed if__ASSUME_SYSVIPC_SYSCALL is not
defined.

Is sys/msg.h needed for __ASSUME_SYSVIPC_SYSCALL only? If so, it's
better to #include kernel-features.h instead.

The same for other patches of series.

Yury.

>  
>  int
>  __libc_msgsnd (int msqid, const void *msgp, size_t msgsz, int msgflg)
>  {
> +#ifdef __ASSUME_SYSVIPC_SYSCALL
> +  return SYSCALL_CANCEL (msgsnd, msqid, msgp, msgsz, msgflg);
> +#else
>    return SYSCALL_CANCEL (ipc, IPCOP_msgsnd, msqid, msgsz, msgflg,
>  			 (void *) msgp);
> +#endif
>  }
>  weak_alias (__libc_msgsnd, msgsnd)
> -- 
> 2.7.4