[PATCH] Fix warning from latest GCC in tst-printf.c

[Steve Ellcey]

On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 17:37 +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Nov 2016, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Ping.  One of the snprintf statements in this test is using a %.999999u
> > format so it is obvious that the test wants to test formats that would
> > go beyond the limit of the snprintf buffer and so we should ignore the
> > warnings in this test.
> OK provided you've tested that this change works with older GCC that lack 
> the new option (otherwise it would need to be conditional on the GCCÂ 
> version).

I did forget to check it with an older GCC and it does fail with GCC
5.4. Â Here is a new version with a conditional. Â  Tested with GCC 5.4
and GCC 7.0 (prerelease).

Ok to checkin?

Steve Ellcey
sellcey@caviumnetworks.com


2016-11-01  Steve Ellcey  <sellcey@caviumnetworks.com>

	* stdio-common/tst-printf.c: Ignore -Wformat-length warning.



diff --git a/stdio-common/tst-printf.c b/stdio-common/tst-printf.c
index 2896b18..ffe7ac7 100644
--- a/stdio-common/tst-printf.c
+++ b/stdio-common/tst-printf.c
@@ -32,6 +32,11 @@
    The compiler warnings are not useful here.  */
 DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (4.9, "-Wformat");
 
+#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0)
+/* Compiler warnings about format lengths should also be ignored.  */
+DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7.0, "-Wformat-length");
+#endif
+
 static void rfg1 (void);
 static void rfg2 (void);
 static void rfg3 (void);