[PATCH 7/8] Remove type specific information from auto-libm-test-in

[Joseph Myers]

On Wed, 18 May 2016, Paul E. Murphy wrote:

>  # where a result inaccurate by a few ulp could differ from the ideal
>  # result in whether it overflows; +/- 10ulp is sufficient for overflow
>  # or its absence to be unambiguous under glibc's accuracy standards).
> -# This also means the ldbl-128ibm inputs are XFAILed for dbl-64 and
> -# the ldbl-128 inputs for ldbl-96, as too close to the threshold.
> +# This also means the ibm128 inputs are XFAILed for binary64 and
> +# the binary128 inputs for ldbl-96, as too close to the threshold.

You have a stray ldbl-96 reference in a comment that's not updated.  I 
think this one needs to be a combination of (automatic patch, manual fixup 
patch), unless you add a sed command specifically for this one reference.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com