[PATCH 0/8] Refactor libm-tests.c and friends

[Joseph Myers]

I don't see anything in this series to address cases where arguments or 
results in libm-test.inc are e.g. M_PI_2l.  Is that deliberately intended 
to be addressed later, or did I miss something in the series?

(It obviously *does* need to be addressed for float128; you can't use 
M_PI_2l as an expected result when long double is IBM long double and 
you're testing float128, because float128 has higher precision than long 
double in that case, so an inaccurate expected result would show spurious 
large errors.)

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com