[PATCH] Fix tst-cancel17/tst-cancelx17, which sometimes segfaults while exiting.
Florian Weimer
fweimer@redhat.com
Tue May 17 08:06:00 GMT 2016
On 05/17/2016 08:57 AM, Stefan Liebler wrote:
> * nptl/tst-cancel17.c (do_test): Wait for finishing aio_read(&a).
Nice analysis. Looks good to me.
> diff --git a/nptl/tst-cancel17.c b/nptl/tst-cancel17.c
> index fb89292..9ff4e27 100644
> --- a/nptl/tst-cancel17.c
> +++ b/nptl/tst-cancel17.c
> @@ -333,6 +333,22 @@ do_test (void)
>
> puts ("early cancellation succeeded");
>
> + if (ap == &a2)
> + {
> + /* The aio_read(&a) was not canceled, because the read request was
> + already in progress. In the meanwhile aio_write(ap) wrote something
> + to the pipe and the read request either has already been finished or
> + is able to read the requested byte.
> + Wait for the read request before returning from this function, because
> + the return value and error code from the read syscall will be written
> + to the struct aiocb a, which lays on the stack of this function.
> + Otherwise the stack from subsequent function calls - e.g. _dl_fini -
> + will be corrupted, which can lead to undefined behaviour like a
> + segmentation fault. */
I think it should be âwhich *lies* on the stackâ (the intransitive
variant), and a comma before âbecauseâ is frowned upon in some circles.
Thanks,
Florian
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list