[RFC][PATCH v2 3/6] Implement the %OB specifier - alternative month names (bug 10871)

[Dmitry V. Levin]

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 01:55:13AM +0100, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
[...]
> This means that all applications using %B to retrieve the month
> name standalone should use %OB from now.

Such applications as cal(1) would not be able to print month names
properly in a way that would work with different glibc versions.
Looks like this is a change incompatible in both ways.


-- 
ldv
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20160329/219b775b/attachment.sig>