[PATCH x86-64][BZ #20024] Fixed vector sincos/sincosf ABI

[Andrew Senkevich]

2016-06-22 18:12 GMT+03:00 Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>:
> Also, I don't see how this definition can work.  It looks to me like: you
> initialize the vectors of pointers with lots of copies of the same pointer
> (as INIT_VEC_LOOP is about putting lots of copies of the same value in a
> vector).  Then you call the vector function.  Then the TEST_VEC_LOOP calls
> have a first argument that is, via some indirection, just r or r1, so they
> would look successively at r[0], r[1] etc. - but only r[0] and r1[0]
> actually exist.  Given this, I don't understand why the implementation you
> have would have passed the tests at all.

Unfolded TEST_VEC_LOOP looks successively at mr[0], mr[1] not at r[0], r[1].
mr[0], mr[1] etc. are the same pointer, yes, but mx also contains
equal values...
Is it Ok?


--
WBR,
Andrew