[COMMITTED] Clarify comments in Linux times() implementation.

[Andreas Schwab]

Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> writes:

> +  /* On Linux this function never fails except with EFAULT.
> +     POSIX says that returning a value (clock_t) -1 indicates an error,
> +     but on Linux this is simply one of the valid clock values after
> +     clock_t wraps.  Therefore when we would return (clock_t) -1, we
> +     instead return (clock_t) 0, and loose a tick of accuracy (having

s/loose/lose/

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE  1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."