[PATCH] elf: Add declarations for BPF
Mark Wielaard
mjw@redhat.com
Tue Jun 7 19:42:00 GMT 2016
On Tue, 2016-06-07 at 15:10 -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 06/07/2016 02:07 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > The e_machine value is provisionary, but will serve for now.
> > I want to use this value in elfutils and systemtap. I will
> > also propagate the value to llvm and their bpf backend.
> >
> > The R_BPF_MAP_FD value is being used by llvm, although they are
> > using the name R_X86_64_64, which is perhaps less than ideal. ;-)
>
> Who defines the e_machine values these days?
Apparently it is still SCO (at least it was a year ago):
http://moxielogic.org/blog/elf-machine-number.html
" Just send a nice email requesting the number assignment to
registry@sco.com and they'll increment their most recent number and add
you to the list."
But it might be that it moved to registry@uxsglobal.com. That seems to
be the last address used on the sysv-gabi mailinglist. If that also
doesn't work, then best to ask on the sysv-gabi mailinglist itself
generic-abi@googlegroups.com
Cheers,
Mark
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list