[PATCH v3] Add nextup and nextdown math functions

[Rajalakshmi Srinivasaraghavan]

On 06/03/2016 05:02 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2016, Rical Jasan wrote:
>
>> I can't recall ever seeing a function call within a paragraph, and
>> haven't been able to find an example, skimming through the manual.  I
>> suggest using a similar style to what you've already used (i.e., "If
>> @var{x} is @code{-HUGE_VAL}, the return value is @code{-HUGE_VAL}.") or
>> breaking it out into a @smallexample and rearranging/rewording as necessary.
>
> The basic problem with the documentation in the patch is that it's too
> closely based on the text from the standard.  It needs to be rewritten
> from scratch without being based on the text from the TS.
>
Addressed the comments on v2.
Tested on powerpc64 and powerpc64le.I have not validated 
TEST_COND_binary128 tests added in math/libm-test.inc.

-- 
Thanks
Rajalakshmi S
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Add-nextup-and-nextdown-math-functions.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 56626 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20160606/7c4c5bb9/attachment.bin>