Testing glibc 2.24 on remaining machines.
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Fri Jul 22 05:44:00 GMT 2016
On 07/21/2016 10:06 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> Then should we follow option (1) not further support pre-v9 sparc?
> If so, much the same approach should be followed as for i386: make configure
> give an error when the compiler is configured for pre-v9; merge sysdeps
> directories so there are no longer separate sparcv8 and sparcv9
> subdirectories but sparc/sparc32 assumes v9; remove obsolete preprocessor
> conditionals such as in kernel-features.h.
Possibly we should retain a place for Leon3, which is mostly v8 but adds the
casa instruction and the ability to use #ASI_USER_DATA from userspace.
r~
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list