Good mailing list to use to send out test results to

[Andrew Pinski]

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 3:02 AM, Torvald Riegel <triegel@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 00:44 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
>> >> FAIL: malloc/tst-malloc-thread-exit
>> >> FAIL: malloc/tst-malloc-thread-fail
>> >> FAIL: nptl/tst-cond16
>> >> FAIL: nptl/tst-cond17
>> >> FAIL: nptl/tst-cond20
>> >> FAIL: nptl/tst-dlsym1
>> >> FAIL: nptl/tst-robust8
>> >> FAIL: nptl/tst-robustpi8
>> >> FAIL: nptl/tst-rwlock16
>> >> FAIL: nptl/tst-sem14
>> >> FAIL: nptl/tst-stack4
>> >> FAIL: rt/tst-mqueue6
>>
>> tst-cond16: pthread_mutex_lock.c:81: __pthread_mutex_lock: Assertion
>> `mutex->__data.__owner == 0' failed.
>> This non-math ones could be an issue with the ARMv8.1 LSE extensions
>> (I have to look to see if it is that or hw issue).
>> I will run one test without LSE to see if I get a failures there too.
>
> That would be good.  My gut feeling would be that there's something
> wrong on levels lower than the sync data structures (eg, atomics
> implementation).  I'm pretty sure the semaphore implementation works
> correctly provided our C11 atomics are implemented correctly.

Just FYI.  This was a known hardware errata but I had an older
firmware on the machine so it was hitting it.

Thanks,
Andrew