Malloc improvements
Florian Weimer
fweimer@redhat.com
Tue Jul 12 09:02:00 GMT 2016
On 07/12/2016 02:10 AM, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's great to see the current focus on improving malloc. One thing that
> would really help POWER is reducing the number of locks and atomics in
> the fast path. Right now we have 3 in the malloc fastpath and 2 in
> free. These add up.
Does the hook variable read count as an atomic operation in this sense?
Thanks,
Florian
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list