[PATCH] tst-malloc-thread-exit: run less aggressively
Chris Metcalf
cmetcalf@ezchip.com
Mon Jan 25 18:10:00 GMT 2016
On 01/25/2016 06:05 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 01/23/2016 03:59 AM, Chris Metcalf wrote:
>> On 1/22/2016 2:00 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> On 01/22/2016 06:34 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>>> I haven't finished the mallopt approach. It seems that my mental model
>>>> how the test works is wrong. Two threads with eight arenas appear to
>>>> trigger the issue reliably, but I want to test on a larger machine as
>>>> well, to make sure the test is any good there. The problem there is
>>>> that I wasn't
>>> Â… able to find sufficiently large box. That has now changed, and I can
>>> confirm that the bug still reproduces with the changed test.
>>>
>>> Chris, can you confirm that the tweaked test addresses your problem?
>>> Then I'll send a real patch for review.
>> Yes, with your patch the test passes, in just over 5 seconds of runtime.
> Did you try this patch with the fix backed out? Does it still fail?
I reverted your change to malloc/arena.c and the test failed with an abort.
--
Chris Metcalf, EZChip Semiconductor
http://www.ezchip.com
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list