Release manager for glibc 2.24?

[Carlos O'Donell]

On 02/22/2016 01:28 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2016, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> 
>> You did a great job. The fault lies entirely with my confused documentation
>> of the release process, I have added some more [REQUIRED] and [OPTIONAL]
>> markers at every step to clarify what needs to be done and what can be skipped
>> given time constraints.
> 
> I think you need markers to say more prominently what the times at which 
> things are needed are.  For example, that libc.pot should be regenerated 
> and a snapshot sent to the TP immediately after the freeze (it's no good 
> if that section isn't noticed until the final release is being made).

Updated. Ordered tasks by distance to release.

Cheers,
Carlos.