[PATCH 3/5] localedata: CLDRv28: update LC_ADDRESS.country_name translations
Carlos O'Donell
carlos@redhat.com
Tue Feb 23 03:43:00 GMT 2016
On 02/22/2016 01:35 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Carlos O'Donell:
>
>> On 02/22/2016 06:12 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> * Carlos O'Donell:
>>>
>>>> I suggest we continue the work and I will ask FSF legal to comment
>>>> on the issue of needing an attribution for the use of the Unicode
>>>> data files. I am still of the opinion that the original statement
>>>> from the FSF is enough guidance, to continue the work Mike is doing,
>>>> but it doesn't hurt to get clarification.
>>>
>>> Please also point them out that ISO currently seems to re-sell glibc
>>> locale data under a restrictive license. This is probably not what
>>> the FSF wanted to enabled when it disclaimed copyright on glibc locale
>>> data.
>>
>> Could you expand on this please? What exactly are they doing and how
>> can I verify this?
>
> See my parallel response to Keld.
>
> It seems you can find some of these documents with a web search for
> "it is taken from glibc sources" (*with* quotes).
Thanks. I do indeed see ISO/IEC TR 30112:2014 for sale (chf 198).
http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=53232
However, I can't confirm that the working draft is identical to
the final published copy, the glibc relevant i18ln data might
have been removed before publication (doubtful).
I have not emailed fsf legal about this issue, and I don't
plan to do so because it might confuse the issue, and I myself
am not a lawyer so I can't make any judgement here.
Cheers,
Carlos.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list