[PATCH] BZ #19575: Clarify status of entries in GB 18030-2005.

[Carlos O'Donell]

On 02/09/2016 05:29 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com> writes:
> 
>> Why not in the file itself as the patch does?
> 
> Because it singles out GB18030 which only creates confusion.

How does it create confusion?

I find it adds clarity to the character map by explaining why
the comments are there e.g. non-normative changes which are
done because of a newer supporting Unicode with non-PUA code
points that can be used.

Cheers,
Carlos.