[PATCH] BZ #19575: Clarify status of entries in GB 18030-2005.

Carlos O'Donell carlos@redhat.com
Mon Feb 8 21:48:00 GMT 2016


On 02/08/2016 04:45 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com> writes:
> 
>> In bug 19575 Florian Weimer asks about the status of the glibc
>> support for GB 18030-2005, since ICU and Emacs produce slightly
>> different results than glibc.
> 
> Emacs uses the same table as glibc.

Good.

>> +% The code points from <UFE10> to <UFE19> are a adjustment
>> +% of the GB 18030-2005 standard to account for the fact that
>> +% with Unicode 4.1 support we can now correctly represent those
>> +% entries, which in the standard, used PUA code points.
> 
> There are more differences between GB18030-2000 and GB18030-2005.

Agreed.

This patch is only to clarify why these entries are being mapped
differently than in the original GB 18030-2005 standard.

Does the patch seem suitable to you?

Cheers,
Carlos.



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list