sunrpc/rpc/types.h question

[Christian Groessler]

On 02/03/16 18:19, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> No, this is the right way around.  __u_char etc are already defined at
> this point, and are being used to define u_char etc.  You may have
> been confused by the macro __u_char_defined, which is defined when
> u_char is defined, *not* when __u_char is defined.  If we had a macro
> to tell us whether __u_char had been defined (we don't, AFAICT, nor do
> we need one) that macro would be named ____u_char_defined.


Ahh, ok.

Yes, I was confused by "__u_char_defined".

Sorry for the noise.

Thanks,
chris