[PATCH] [BZ #20985] robust mutexes: Fix broken x86 assembly by removing it
Torvald Riegel
triegel@redhat.com
Thu Dec 22 11:23:00 GMT 2016
On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 12:06 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 12/22/2016 11:22 AM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> > (LLL_ROBUST_MUTEX_LOCK_MODIFIER): New.
>
> This needs to be documented in the code. It seems the code always
> defines it as 0, so it's not clear to me why it makes sense to define it
> at all (twice even).
This should be defined differently when pthread_mutex_cond_lock.c
includes the file; I just noticed that it doesn't do that.
Is the patch OK besides that (ie, so after fixing that oversight and
adding a suitable comment to the definition of
LLL_ROBUST_MUTEX_LOCK_MODIFIER?).
> I think this patch addresses part of bug 20965 as well.
Yes.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list