[PATCH 02/12] Do not stack-protect ifunc resolvers.
Florian Weimer
fweimer@redhat.com
Thu Dec 15 12:18:00 GMT 2016
On 11/28/2016 01:32 PM, Nix wrote:
> diff --git a/config.h.in b/config.h.in
> index 1b58612..b42c4d8 100644
> --- a/config.h.in
> +++ b/config.h.in
> @@ -48,6 +48,10 @@
> /* Define if compiler accepts -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns. */
> #undef HAVE_CC_INHIBIT_LOOP_TO_LIBCALL
>
> +/* Define if compiler accepts -fno-stack-protector in an
> + __attribute__((__optimize__)). */
Space after __attribute__; at least that's the current style.
> +#undef HAVE_CC_NO_STACK_PROTECTOR
> +
> /* The level of stack protection in use for glibc as a whole. */
> #undef STACK_PROTECTOR_LEVEL
I don't have STACK_PROTECTOR_LEVEL in my sources, so this patch does not
apply. Did you post the sequence in the right order?
Thanks,
Florian
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list