build-many-glibcs.py question (updating for multilibs on aarch64)

[Joseph Myers]

On Mon, 12 Dec 2016, Steve Ellcey wrote:

> > I'd probably use variant names rather than changing the architecture name 
> > in this case.
> 
> OK, I think I see how to implement that (based on examples like armeb
> and m68k). Â But how do you specify a variant to build on the command
> line? Â I.e. if I wanted to build just the coldfire variant of m68k,
> what would my build-many-glibcs.py call look like to build that one
> target/variant.
> 
> 'build-many-glibcs.py compilers m68k-linux-gnu' would presumably just
> build the default variant and not coldfire.

You'd use e.g. m68k-linux-gnu-coldfire as the name on the command line.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com