[PATCHv2 5/5] ldbl-128: Fix minor readability issues after applying L(x) macro.

[Joseph Myers]

On Fri, 19 Aug 2016, Paul E. Murphy wrote:

> I am indifferent.  Here is what the patches look like running
> -L(x) -> L(-x) transformation after integral simplification.

I think we should go with the L(-x) approach (to be clear, this is not a 
review of the patch; I don't expect to review these substitutions and 
fixups in detail until all the prior patches they depend on are in).

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com