[PATCH] sln: Install as a hard link to ldconfig

[Maciej W. Rozycki]

On Tue, 2 Aug 2016, Mike Frysinger wrote:

> i agree, but i don't think it's something we need to support.  having just
> a static (bash) shell doesn't get you very far -- you've got a few bash
> builtins and that's it.  trying to actually recover from things often need
> far more commands.  sln only helps you with creating symlinks (e.g. like
> resetting glibc links, assuming it's a glibc install error).  i think that
> special casing this one scenario doesn't make sense nowadays.

 FAOD, I wrote:

>  This is to get the facts straight that is -- whether to keep or discard
> `sln' is of course another matter.

which I think clarifies my statement was not meant to support the 
retaining of `sln', but just to clear any confusion there might be about 
ways of recovery provided by Linux.

> in Gentoo, we ship a build of busybox with a lot of built-in commands.
> you can recover form a wide range of issues, set up the network, fetch
> files over the network, and decompress/unpack archives.

 Coincidentally I thought it would be a good idea to have `busybox' as the 
static shell, so I find it nice that you have thought about it too.

  Maciej