glibc 2.24 -- Cutting the branch and my FSF steward position on __malloc_initialize_hook.

Carlos O'Donell carlos@redhat.com
Mon Aug 1 15:37:00 GMT 2016


On 08/01/2016 11:22 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> Adhemerval,
> 
> As an FSF steward my position is that we should _not_ revert the 
> __malloc_initialize_hook changes, and that we should cut the branch today.

I see I missed the fact that:

* malloc: Remove malloc_get_state, malloc_set_state

Remains on the blocker list.

I think this needs to be deferred to 2.25 at the open of the branch.

The primary reason here is that we should be changing ABI in the freeze.

If you agree, is there anything else blocking 2.24 being cut today?

-- 
Cheers,
Carlos.



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list