[PATCH v5] Add pretty printers for the NPTL lock types
Siddhesh Poyarekar
sid@reserved-bit.com
Tue Apr 12 05:59:00 GMT 2016
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 08:33:25AM +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> So you're only suggesting moving nptl-printers.py to nptl, which seems
> fine given that it is specific to nptl. That does not conflict with
> my insistence to have a subdir for pretty-printers because my
> intention was to make it the destination for common code. I did not
> pay attention to what *should't* go into pretty-printers, which I now
> realize I should have.
I just looked at my original email and I admit that I had suggested
putting all pretty printers code into a separate directory and not
just the common code. That does not make sense given our current code
layout and it does make more sense to keep common code and tests in
pretty-printers, while keeping module-specific code in their module
directories.
Siddhesh
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list