O_CLOEXEC and SOCK_CLOEXEC
Florian Weimer
fweimer@redhat.com
Thu Oct 8 06:20:00 GMT 2015
On 10/07/2015 10:04 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
> NaCl defines them but doesn't actually support them.
> But it doesn't actually support FD_CLOEXEC either.
> So you can consider NaCl to "support" O_CLOEXEC.
>
> On the Hurd, these are implemented entirely in libc. So if any part of the
> support is missing, it can be fixed in libc.
What about SOCK_NONBLOCK? There is fallback code which looks at the
SOCK_CLOEXEC flag, but actually uses SOCK_NONBLOCK.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list