O_CLOEXEC and SOCK_CLOEXEC

[Thomas Schwinge]

Hi!

On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 16:41:24 +0200, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
> Do we still have targets that do not support them?  What about Hurd and
> NaCl?

Hurd does support O_CLOEXEC, and I have patches for SOCK_CLOEXEC where I
just need to act on review comments before upstream integration.  Given
this...

> The corresponding __have_* variables are not updated atomically, and I
> wonder if we need to fix that, or if we can just remove the fallback.

..., from the Hurd point of view, it's OK to remove the fallback code
already.


Grüße,
 Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 472 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20151007/5529303f/attachment.sig>