Building consensus over DNSSEC enhancements to glibc.
Florian Weimer
fweimer@redhat.com
Thu Nov 19 14:24:00 GMT 2015
On 11/19/2015 06:22 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> Dare I say that systemd-resolved might solve some of this already?
Unfortunately, systemd-resolved caches far too aggressively and will
poison its cache, even accidentally. Various parties have tried to
explain this to the upstream developers, but have not succeeded.
systemd-resolved should be safe to run behind a BIND 9 recursive server
in non-forwarding mode, but not much else (I believe even Unbound is
unsafe due to its last-resort message handling).
systemd-resolved also does not handle exotic record types, I think, it
is more an NSS-level solution than a libresolv-level solution.
(An earlier attempt in this direction is lwresd, which is part of BIND 9.)
Florian
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list