LIBC_PROBE and locks
Florian Weimer
fweimer@redhat.com
Tue Nov 17 14:12:00 GMT 2015
On 11/17/2015 05:20 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 11/16/2015 12:54 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Is it okay to call LIBC_PROBE while internal locks are held? Or could
>> this result in deadlocks by itself? (I'm aware that the arguments are
>> always evaluated.)
>
> How would it cause deadlocks? The external observer, say systemtap or
> gdb, are outside of the process and should not modify the state of the
> process in such a way as to cause a deadlock. Under what conditions might
> the evaluation of the arguments cause a deadlock?
Are only external observers supported? I wasn't sure if this is some
sort of self-observing capability which is supposed to work, in which
case this would be some sort of callback mechanism and subject to
similar locking issues.
Frank tells me that self-inspection isn't supported, so my concern is
unfounded.
Florian
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list