[PATCH] Eliminate redundant sign extensions in pow()
Joseph Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
Mon Nov 16 10:57:00 GMT 2015
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> When looking at the code generated for pow() on ppc64 I noticed quite
> a few sign extensions. Making the array indices unsigned reduces the
> number of sign extensions from 24 to 7.
OK with a ChangeLog entry if you've done the usual testing with the
testsuite without any new ulps for pow appearing (you didn't say).
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list