Other ISO C TR / TS / standard optional APIs

[Torvald Riegel]

On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 21:43 +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
> * C11 threads.  I believe we have consensus that these are appropriate 
> (for libpthread).  The patches submitted in August need substantive review 
> from a threads expert, as well as revisions for my review comments last 
> month.

I agree :)

There might a Transactional Memory TS coming in the future, but that
support is already in GCC/libitm (which makes sense given