[PATCH] Remove signal handling for nanosleep (bug 16364)

[Florian Weimer]

On 11/08/2015 11:52 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> Linux 2.6.32 and forward do not show the issue regarding SysV SIGCHLD
> vs. SIG_IGN for nanosleep which make it feasible to use it for sleep
> implementation without requiring any hacking to handle the spurious
> wake up.  This patch simplifies the sleep code to call nanosleep
> directly.
> 
> Checked on x86_64, ppc64le, and aarch64.

Do you know the kernel commit which fixed this?

Thanks,
Florian