[PATCHv4][PING][BZ #17833] _dl_close_worker() does not release inconsistent objects.

Pavel Kopyl p.kopyl@samsung.com
Wed May 27 13:45:00 GMT 2015



On 05/13/2015 02:40 PM, Pavel Kopyl wrote:
>
>
> On 04/24/2015 02:47 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:33 AM, Pavel Kopyl <p.kopyl@samsung.com> 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/03/2015 12:13 PM, Pavel Kopyl wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 03/01/2015 10:17 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>>>> On 27 Feb 2015 16:32, Pavel Kopyl wrote:
>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>> +++ b/elf/tst-unique5lib.cc
>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
>>>>>> +
>>>>> i know existing tests are bad examples, but lets try and start fixing
>>>>> that.
>>>>> namely, there should be a header here giving a quick overview of 
>>>>> what it
>>>>> is
>>>>> exactly you're testing for, and a BZ reference.
>>>>>
>>>>>> +extern int not_exist ();
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +inline int make_unique ()
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> +  static int unique;
>>>>>> +  return ++unique;
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +int foo ()
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> +  return make_unique () + not_exist ();
>>>>>> +}
>>>>> i don't know if this is just copy & pasting, but prototypes that 
>>>>> do not
>>>>> intend
>>>>> to take args should always be (void).
>>>>> -mike
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for review, I fixed that in patch v3.
>>> Ping.
>>>
>> Some comments:
>>
>> 1. The bug report is against STB_GNU_UNIQUE.  But I don't see 
>> STB_GNU_UNIQUE in
>> testcase.  I can't tell if the original STB_GNU_UNIQUE bug is fixed.
>> 2. Your testcase ignores dlopen error.  Why should it work at all?
>> 3. Your testcase doesn't use test-skeleton.c.
>>
>
> Thanks for review!
>
> 1. I added some comments in testcase to be more clear.
>
> 2. Actually the call below is expected to return NULL because of 
> undefined symbol in the library.
>
> dlopen ("$ORIGIN/tst-unique5lib.so", RTLD_NOW);
>
> It's a goal of this testcase: I need some library with STB_GNU_UNIQUE 
> symbols that returns error when trying to load it.
> In new patch version I especially point out to this fact by checking 
> return value.
>
> 3. It seems for me that template of the test-skeleton.c is not 
> appropriate because this testcase has two related binary - library and 
> executable.
>
>
> -Pavel
Ping.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: delete_inconsistent_objs_v4.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 6494 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20150527/d96e01ed/attachment.bin>


More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list