[PATCH 00/19] converting system calls to 64-bit time_t, part 1
Paul Bolle
pebolle@tiscali.nl
Thu May 7 09:25:00 GMT 2015
On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 10:52 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 07 May 2015 09:39:18 Paul Bolle wrote:
> I realize the downsides of not posting the entire series at once
> here, but it seemed better to avoid spamming everyone too much,
> while I try to find out if we have agreement on the overall
> strategy.
That downside is worse when people only quickly skim your message for
clues while thinking about the problem they _think_ they've spotted
(like I did).
> For reference, see below for the ARM patch.
> > And then it occurred to me to check the y2038-syscalls git branch you
> > referenced. After which the above made much more sense. (Though my
> > remark that ARCH_HAS_COMPAT_TIME simply functions as an alias for COMPAT
> > also seems to hold for that branch.)
>
> Right, in fact both of these happen at the end of the git tree.
Still, you might consider making ARCH_HAS_COMPAT_TIME a plain bool and
adding "select ARCH_HAS_COMPAT_TIME" to the eight or so COMPAT entries.
But, clearly, I'm now wasting even more of your time by trying to save
face here.
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list