[PATCH v2] Complete example in error message documentation.

[Mike Frysinger]

On 06 Mar 2015 00:44, ricaljasan wrote:
> Is that the general approach I should take while fixing the manual,
> then?  Cleaner diffs, I suppose, than:
> 
>   sed '/subjective cruft/{s/.*/@c &/}'

honestly, the smaller/more self contained your patches, the more likely they are 
to get reviewed/merged.  larger patches that combine multiple changes into one 
are significantly less likely to get reviewed.  especially changes to the 
manual.  will power is a commodity.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20150306/4d937992/attachment.sig>