Another GLIBC build error with GCC6

[Andreas Schwab]

Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com> writes:

> In this case, the left shift doesn't even lose any bits, because the high
> bit is already zero (and it's a constant, so the compiler knows that).  In
> fact, that's the whole point of the thing: to sign-extend the 31-bit value
> to 32 bits.  I don't think it should complain about 0x7fffffff << 1.

Only if you make 0x7fffffff unsigned.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE  1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."