Machine maintainer veto.

[Mike Frysinger]

On 06 Jul 2015 13:09, Steven Munroe wrote:
> It takes at least two to be constructive. Some like argue perfection or
> require convincing everyone (not just GLIBC community members) to change
> what they are already doing to a more "correct" way. Like saying users
> are stupid and they doing it wrong is not constructive. 

it doesn't logically follow that a bad solution should be deployed purely
because users can't be bothered to improve their practices.  so attempting
to justify a change based purely on "this is the only API users will use"
doesn't really fly in my mind.

(don't try and extrapolate this into specifics on the ppc/hwcaps issue as
that is a waste of time -- this thread is talking generalities.)
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20150708/7bac78bf/attachment.sig>