glibc 2.21 - Machine maintainers, please test your machines.

[Torvald Riegel]

On Mon, 2015-01-26 at 05:25 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:50 AM, Torvald Riegel <triegel@redhat.com> wrote:
> > way?  If so, then using __alignof__(sem_t) in Chris' patch would be good
> > because then to_new_sem would resolve to a noop in x32 with your
> > alignment change applied.
> 
> I don't want a noop.  I want compiler not to generate a noop at all.

Yes, that's what I mean.  Compiler should figure out that no conversion
is necessary and not emit any code for this conversion.