glibc 2.21 - Machine maintainers, please test your machines.

[H.J. Lu]

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com> wrote:
> On 1/25/2015 10:18 AM, Chris Metcalf wrote:
>>
>> I'm now running with the following change, to see if tilegx32 will
>> also pass with it; this implements my suggestion of rounding new_sem to
>> an 8-byte boundary explicitly on ILP32 platforms.
>
>
> With my proposed change, tilegx32 (and tilegx64) pass all the tests.
> Repeated
> here with a suitable ChangeLog.  Let me know if this is acceptable to commit
> for 2.21.
>
> 2015-01-25  Chris Metcalf  <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
>
>         * sysdeps/nptl/internaltypes.h (to_new_sem): Define.  Provides new
>         behavior for [__HAVE_64B_ATOMICS && !defined (_LP64)].
>         * nptl/sem_getvalue.c (__new_sem_getvalue): Use to_new_sem.
>         * nptl/sem_init.c (__new_sem_init): Likewise.
>         * nptl/sem_post.c (__new_sem_post): Likewise.
>         * nptl/sem_wait.c (__new_sem_wait): Likewise.
>         (__new_sem_trywait): Likewise.
>         * nptl/sem_timedwait.c (sem_timedwait): Likewise.
>         * nptl/sem_open.c (sem_open): Add comment about to_new_sem.
>
>

Can you try something similar to siginfo_t in:

sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86/bits/siginfo.h

We had a similar problem on x32 before.


-- 
H.J.