[PATCH 2/8] Function declaration cleanup

[H.J. Lu]

On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com> wrote:
>> On 08-10-2014 18:52, Roland McGrath wrote:
>> > This sort of change should get the "no disassembly of compiled code
>> > changed" test rather than the vanilla "no regressions" test.  With that
>> > testing, changes like this can count as "obvious enough".
>> >
>> Thanks, I compared the dissassembly of compiled code and it shows no change.
>> Is that ok to apply?
>
> Yes.  What I meant to communicate is that whenever you have a
> prototypification change, just verifying that it doesn't change the
> compiled code is enough to commit it without explicit approval from
> another person.  (Of course it never hurts to let people look it over for
> typos or bad indentation or whatever, but when you're confident you got
> those trivia correct, you can just commit without waiting for replies.)
>

I am cleaning up patchwork queue.  I checked in this patch.


-- 
H.J.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Function-declaration-cleanup.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 30602 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20150106/f0572aab/attachment.bin>