question about which sleep is noted in manual
Alexandre Oliva
aoliva@redhat.com
Tue Jan 6 00:10:00 GMT 2015
On Dec 23, 2014, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
> I have also verified that, without the change to sleep.c, the test
> fails.
> I don't think this is user-visible enough to deserve a bug report and a
> mention in NEWS, but if anyone disagrees with this assessment, please
> let me now and I'll file the bug report and adjust the patch.
> Ok to install?
> for ChangeLog
> * nptl/Makefile (tests): Add tst-sleep-cancel.
> * nptl/tst-sleep-cancel.c: New.
> * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sleep.c: Include bits/libc-lock.h.
> (__sleep): Enable cleanup handler to restore the signal mask
> at least on synchronous cancellation.
> * intro/time.texi (sleep): Expand unsafety rationale.
Ping?
--
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/
You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi
Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/ FSF Latin America board member
Free Software Evangelist|Red Hat Brasil GNU Toolchain Engineer
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list