[PATCH] Fix broken overflow check in posix_fallocate

[Carlos O'Donell]

On 08/28/2015 01:52 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> * Does anyone mind if we use the terse "Likewise" format?
> 
> There must be some misunderstanding here, as the "Likewise" format is *less* terse than the format I used.  That is, I did this:
> 
>> +    Fix broken overflow check in posix_fallocate
>> +    * sysdeps/posix/posix_fallocate.c (posix_fallocate):
>> +    * sysdeps/posix/posix_fallocate64.c (__posix_fallocate64_l64):
>> +    Fix parenthesization typo.
 
This is what I called the `terse "Likewise"` format.

> rather than this:
> 
>> +    Fix broken overflow check in posix_fallocate
>> +    * sysdeps/posix/posix_fallocate.c (posix_fallocate):
>> +    Fix parenthesization typo.
>> +    * sysdeps/posix/posix_fallocate64.c (__posix_fallocate64_l64):
>> +    Likewise.

This is the standard one.

Does that clarify things?

c.