[PATCH][BZ 16973] Fix lang_lib/lang_term as per ISO 639-2

[keld@keldix.com]

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 04:46:53PM +0300, Marko Myllynen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2015-08-14 08:31, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 11 Aug 2015 10:54, Marko Myllynen wrote:
> >> lang_lib (which reflects ISO 639-2/B (bibliographic) codes) and
> >> lang_term (which reflects ISO 639-2/T (terminology) codes) should be
> >> identical except for those languages for which ISO 639-2 specifies
> >> separate bibliographic/terminology values.
> > 
> > i'm inclined to just merge w/out having to load the standard and double
> > check the values myself.  is that wrong ?
> 
> FWIW, I used this Library of Congress page as the source, it seemed to
> match the corresponding Wikipedia page:
> 
> http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ISO_639-2_codes

The LoC is the official page for the ISO_639-2 codes.

Best regards
Keld