glibc 2.22 -- Final testing for 32-bit x86 failing?

[Paul Pluzhnikov]

On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:55 AM, Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com> wrote:
>
> > Hmm, for some reason I can't reproduce this anymore, and unistd.h is
> > already included indirectly.
> >
> > I don't understand why that's happening. But it still seems like a
> > good idea from header hygiene perspective.
>
> It is definitely correct (and in the "obvious" category) to have each
> source file explicitly #include the header that is the canonical declarator
> of each symbol that source file uses directly.


committed as 2ba30a182ca50ac07f45ed1f813a85ccafaed85d

Thanks,
-- 
Paul Pluzhnikov