glibc 2.22 -- Final testing for 32-bit x86 failing?

[Paul Pluzhnikov]

On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:15 AM, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 08/01/2015 06:27 PM, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
>> The following trivial patch fixes this:
>
> LGTM for 2.23, which is now open. Falls under the obvious category
> for including a header for a function you use.

Hmm, for some reason I can't reproduce this anymore, and unistd.h is
already included indirectly.

I don't understand why that's happening. But it still seems like a
good idea from header hygiene perspective.

-- 
Paul Pluzhnikov