[PATCH][AArch64] update libm-test-ulps

[Adhemerval Zanella]

Hi,

This is ok, small ulps for some function is expected, you need to 
watch out only if the precision cross a higher threshold (like the 
some for IBM long double) or if your are seeing precision issues
in function that are *not* suppose show any.


On 07-04-2015 08:08, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> Regenerated libm-test-ulps for AArch64 using 'make regen-ulps'.
>
> There are some minor differences compared to x86_64
> float, ifloat, double and idouble ulps, is that OK?
>
> I also have
>
> Function: "pow_tonearest":
> float: 1
> ifloat: 1
> ildouble: 1
> ldouble: 1
>
> but no other function has _tonearest, is that OK?
>
>
>