Should we require autoconf 2.69?

[H.J. Lu]

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 7:48 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com> wrote:
>> It's OK by me.
>
> I checked it in with the enclosed ChangeLog entries.
>
> --
> H.J.
> ---
> 2014-09-29  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
>
> * aclocal.m4: Require autoconf 2.69.
> * configure: Regenerated.
> * sysdeps/aarch64/configure: Likewise.
> * sysdeps/alpha/configure: Likewise.
> * sysdeps/arm/armv7/configure: Likewise.
> * sysdeps/arm/configure: Likewise.
> * sysdeps/ia64/configure: Likewise.
> * sysdeps/mach/configure: Likewise.
> * sysdeps/mips/configure: Likewise.
> * sysdeps/s390/configure: Likewise.
> * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/configure: Likewise.
> * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/powerpc64/configure: Likewise.

This is what I checked in.  I updated sysdeps/alpha/configure.ac
and sysdeps/ia64/configure.ac to avoid empty line at the end of
files.

-- 
H.J.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Require-autoconf-2.69.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 36857 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20140929/8b4812e0/attachment.bin>