On 09/12/2014 07:52 PM, Roland McGrath wrote: > I forgot to mention the other exception: if (foo & BIT) or if (!(foo & BIT)) > is fine, no need for if ((foo & BIT) != 0) or if ((foo & BIT) == 0). Thanks, so there shouldn't be a need to change the patch. -- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security