Additional malloc hardening
Florian Weimer
fweimer@redhat.com
Tue Sep 23 11:23:00 GMT 2014
On 09/19/2014 02:16 PM, OndÅej BÃlka wrote:
> You do not need for detecting userspace errors. A better way is to add a
> checksum that will detect corruption. Even if it takes one byte with
> randomization it could detect error 50% of time after ten errors its
> 1/1024 chance.
Do you propose to fit this into the existing size field?
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list